“Remember the Mario world where everything is big? Let’s do that with a gorilla; leave off the red hat and mustache.”- the director

(image is large for because humor)


I guess I’m going to be a diva because this movie is part of the Godzilla-Kong saga and it should be comparable to Godzilla (2014).  I enjoyed a lot of this movie’s features. The casting, while not my ideal cast, we pretty fair, with oldies-but-goodies Samuel L. Jackson and John Goodman, doing their parts. The special effects (connected with Lucasfilm) were on par, surpassing those of some the the bigger blockbusters over the last couple of years. I’ll give credit where it’s due, and much of it goes to King Kong’s features, from his facial symmetry to his hairs; I was very pleased.  The action came in heaves, but in surprising, sudden heaves. As you think you’re getting ready for a boring, sit-down-and-tell-me-about-your-past 3 minute snooze-athon, shit gets hammered!

At the same time, I’m going to compare this to King Kong (2005), because it’s in my top 10 favorite movies and because of the title. The 2005 film, albeit it was 3 hours long, was paced very well for being so long; but at the same time, it built a lot of scenes into the first half to make you empathize with the ape himself. Skull Island tried to force it on you by bringing about the antagonist and making him having a personal vendetta to kill Kong. A lot could have been learned in Godzilla (2014) when director Gareth Edwards had you somehow rooting for a gigantic lizard going against two big-ass creatures with lights for eyes- even as Godzilla was demolishing shit-tons of buildings in the populated city, we still felt empathy for the creature. With the island in Kong (2005), it truly felt like another world; animals and creatures sometimes traveled in packs; we witnessed Darwinism as the weak were killed by the strong. In Skull Island, we mostly watch as the pack of war heroes encounter one big-ass monster at a time.

Much of the acting was so hollow in Skull Island that I found myself laughing at some of the death scenes- not because I’m morbid, but because of how little I cared about the characters (unlike in Godzilla). Brie Larson had me wondering how did she win an Oscar the whoooooole time I watched her perfectly 1970s-depicted feathered hairdo.  The frustration behind most of this movie is its chosen style; it wanted to be funny with war-comedic stances like Predator that didn’t seem to work. It wanted to have the shaky camera effects with action scenes when much of the movie didn’t seem to think about it.  It wanted to go back to Forrest Gump times and coerce us to recall that this movie takes place in the 70s with track after track from that time period.

I’m beating the hell out of this movie only because I wanted to like this movie so much. The first 30 minutes held promise, but after watching the acting and having to compare the action to past films, it made me feel like it wasn’t on the right track the whole way.









smell ya later, 2016


Image result for christmas tree on  fireImage result for christmas fightImage result for penguins vs santa simulatorImage result for christmas shopping madness


It’s the most painstaking emotionally-taxing disgusting horrid offensive grueling fattening time of the year.  As we close this shit  show of a chapter that we call 2016, allow me to indulge in things I look forward to in this,our lady, 2017. Please be captivated by the sights and sounds of the year!


Reason #1,304 Disney uses $100 bills to wipe their tears of joy

Image result for beauty and the beast poster

Six of the top ten highest grossing movies last year in the US were Disney-affiliated. Needless to say, 2017’s Beauty and the Beast will surely beat the hell out of the box office, break more records, and hopefully hold a….rose…..to the original (haHA!). And I’m looking forward to see how slutty the feather duster is going to be (gives a lingering glance).

Alien 2: not Aliens though

Ridley Scott’s Alien (1979) was a game changer in horror/sci-fi. The second installment of the prequel trilogy, and following Promethus (2012), Alien: Covenant seems like it can hold some promise and a bit more action, blood, and family fun come May.

All I’ve ever wanted since I was a prepubescent

Image result for power rangers 2017

My life was the Mighty Morphin’ Power Rangers pretty much from age 8 to 12 when it started to become, like, totes social suicide, and then secretly from age 13 to current). Sure, we had the movie in 1995. But if you look back on it, it’s dated and the Megazord battle is embarrassing. Let us bow our heads and pray that 2017’s Power Rangers does a lot more than look sexy (we see your tits, Trini) in March.

Kong growed up

Image result for kong skull island

Initially I was offended and against this reboot. King Kong (2005) was nothing short of fantastic. Kong: Skull Island is part of the new Godzilla-Kong series after Godzilla (2014) (also nothing short of fantastic), which will lead up to Godzilla vs. Kong in 2020 if you’re still alive.

Not Avengers

Image result for justice league 2017

Marvel has been going to town with hero after hero movies to dominate the box office for the last several years. DC wants in, and I’ll open the door, step to the side, and take his or her coat. 2013’s Man of Steel made it to my top 53 movies. Batman v Superman and Suicide Squad were very entertaining.  So let’s wait and see how nuts the box office goes when this one is released in November.

Slap yo mummy in the face

Image result for The Mummy 2017 poster

In the year of reboots, this version of The Mummy will start a new series with Universal Monsters that will debut the Invisible Man, Dr. Jekyll, and Frankenstein’s monster. It could be really cool. Plus, this mummy is a girl, so women’s rights have come so far after all!



the fate of Fifth Harmony

Image result for fifth harmony

Or is it Fourth Harmony? As no surprise, Camila Cabello peaced out weeks ago. Either way, I’m nervous because it’s equal to Zayn leaving One Direction- both of which were arguably the main focal point of the group with over-rated (Hey, Trump!) vocals. Granted, the rest of these bitches are talented af. They avoided the sophomore slump with the knockout 7/27 album, so I await their return as a whore-some foursome! They’ll be performing without Camila for the first time live on 2017 The People’s Choice Awards this month- bless us.

Nelly Furtado’s alleged return

Image result for nelly furtado pipe dreams

A separation that was more difficult that Jack and Kate on Lost– once she started making music without Timbaland after (what Brian declared) the top 10 best pop albums of the 21st century, Loose, it made me wish for them to reconnect annually. While her new album, The Ride, slated for a late March release will be with producers who are not Timbaland, I’ll remain optimistic in that she’s pushing to be different with her new short hairdo and 90s vibe video, “Pipe Dreams.”

Charli XCX wants us to do drugs

Image result for charli xcx

In an effort to get rid of her The Fault in Our Stars “Boom Clap” shit trail, she’s threatening promising her upcoming third album will be filled with nothing but “straight-up pop” and “more club-oriented [music].…  but some of it’s harder and more aggressive, and you’ll want to take more drugs to [one] half than the other.” Hey, if there’s on thing I know about myself, I’ll swallow any version of commercial pop; I just can’t promise how I’ll digest it.


“All off-colored comments aside, this little girl opens up her mouth wide enough to really brighten her future.”-me

To lead in, I’ve never seen the first Ouija movie, and I never will. It looks just plain awful. So, looking at this as a prequel, I can’t say anything. I can say how trailers ruin movies due to over exposure, but that would come as no surprise. Moving forward, I’ll only watch the first trailer for horror movies and not all seven of them. Ouija: Origin of Evil serves nicely as period piece, showcasing some eye-catching looks that don’t make you think twice about it taking place in the 60s. It offers great vintage vibes with it’s unique credit opening, as well. Nothing can be said much for the acting, per usual of most horror movies, save for one Lulu Wilson, the movie’s front-runner creeper. Yes, this kid is cookie-cutter kid actor, but she’s also a horror movie’s dream. She’s so perfect it truly is creepy.

Speaking of scares, this movie offers them a good amount at an odd pace. We begin to see the movie’s shtick as we see constantly the little girl with white eyes and her mouth agape. Like with JLo hits, less is more. The creature looks almost too reminiscent of a combination of those from Insidious and Annabelle, but I can’t be mad because director Mike Flanagan (who semi-impressed me with Hush) is able to hold his own with this movie, which I don’t think can be said for the director of first Ouija. #shade

This movie, if looked at as three segments, draws us in with a reasonably slow but not dull first part. The second segment of this movie makes us feel like we’re getting our money’s worth with some nifty scares and cool shots. The third, which is supposed to be the highlight but ends up being kind of disappointing, still offers a fair twist and makes you pity the original Ouija movie.






“Just pretend 1999 didn’t occur and you’ll be satisfied.”- me

Image result for blair witch poster

So the team behind this movie was crafty in promoting it. Just over a month ago, they rolled out a limited teaser and called it The Woods. And then they pulled the curtains back to inform us that this was, in fact, the next Blair Witch installment. The trend to bring back fantastic movies from two decades continues.  It can be a hit (good morning, Jurassic World) or a miss (tell ya’ mom I said “hey,” Independence Day: Resurgence). The sad reveal is that this, too, is a miss. Let me shower you with reasons why this is actually a good horror flick, though!

If you imagine Blair Witch Project was never created, this movie is top-shelf.  It paces very well, and carries a sense of dread- making you wonder just what all the fuss is about regarding this alleged witch.  The sound effects they use are remarkable, leaving the imagination to truly wonder wtf that noize izzzz!  Quality of film has become technically enhanced in this day and age, so we say goodbye to grainy screens- wondering if something was a shadow or a tree- and ahoy! to being able to see a bit beyond the flashlights and even above and beyond (literally- eye roll emoji) with the help of a drone.

*Spoilers ahead!*


The buildup has not been worth it in a while with horror movies. But the last 25 minutes made this movie great for me.  They show the witch the perfect length of time without overdoing it (a la Mama) and making the movie still scary if you re-watch it. Her appearance makes sense, given her history of being hanged and weighed down with rocks as the stories say. I. LOVE. IT! Also, this movie introduced new powers and realms of the witch with time warps.  It seems silly, but in retrospect, this adds more logistics to the concept of the movie concerning the house not being found, losing their way in the woods, and control of day and night.


*Spoilers be gone now.*

The pitfalls of this movie seemingly outweigh the positives, however. Yes, the pace of the movie is great, but it replicated the original movie. This leads anyone who saw the first movie down the path of knowing exactly what to expect.  In terms of originality, then, Blair Witch comes out empty-pocketed. Additionally, characterization, while still just a horror movie, is tossed aside and forces us to ultimately not care what happens to them. The plot and drive of Blair Witch is forced when it didn’t have to be. The main character finds a Youtube video of found footage in the woods that he thinks might be his sister from the first installment….. right?? Let that simmer. So, almost two decades later, he wants to go look for her because he feels she may still be alive…decades later….in the woods….alone….naked…(wishful thinking). I’m just saying, they could have made this movie take place months later after the original, but noooooooooOOOOooOOoO, THEY HAD TO USE A DRONE!


“Trophy emoji.”- me

Image result for jungle book poster

Color me impressed, because this movie knocked my socks off and even offered me a cigarette afterwards.  I’m not a hardcore fan of much of Jon Favreau’s movies (Iron Man 1-3, Elf, Cowboys & Aliens).   I say that because typically his movies are visually stunning but leave me wanting more in every other aspect of the movie.  The Jungle Book is not the case. This movie did everything right, and then some.   Its visuals alone are so great that I feel I’ve never seen anything like it thus far; CGI animals are hard to pull off, but the realism is beyond impressive.

The voices, on the whole, are stellar.  Bill Murray kills it as Baloo. Ben Kinglsey, as always, is spot-on with Bagheera, the panther.  Idris Elba (emoji with heart eyes) nails it as the nemesis, Shere Khan, the tiger.  Chrisopher Walken as King Louie had me question the casting initially, but the man did a really nice job.  My sole problem with this movie was Kaa’s voice.  With Scarlett Johansson as the voice, it was painful to listen to because she’s known for her bosoms, body, and heroine attributes- not her voice. It was difficult to picture a snake when she talked; all I could hear was the Avengers’ Black Widow. But let’s pay special attention to Neel Sithi as Mowgli.  This kid, with his first full-length feature, was probably talking to Styrofoam heads or sticks that served as the CGI animals, but he delivers some rich emotion and makes you believe.

The pacing through out the movie is timed nicely as we are lead to and  from major characters.  Original songs from the animated version of the movie are revisited and performed playfully without seeming forced.  This movie brings in some dark territory regarding death and man versus animal while still keeping it light for the kiddies.  And even though, yes, I’m obsessed with action, The Jungle Book gives us action scenes without them becoming overbearing or taking away from the emotion of the movie.


The VMA’s featuring Rihanna

Some highlights in case you missed the VMA’s by intentionally turning the tv off:

Image result for dj khaled shirtlessThe sensationally mind-blowing DJ Khaled hosted the preshow, better known as “Performances by Youtube Artists Bonanza” or “Watch This Hour of TV to Feel Old.”  But I’m lying if I say DJ Khaled doesn’t mesmerize me. He captivates me with every word. The second they make a pull-string doll of him with his famous outlandish catch phrases is the moment I’ll be truly happy in life. Congratulations, you played yourself. ANOTHER ONE.

Image result for rihanna opening vmas 2016Rihanna opened with a medley of hits. She received the Vanguard award at the show’s end, so MTV made her perform 4 times to really earn it. She wore (what would be weird outfits if Lady Gaga never existed) mud flaps on her ass, so there’s that. Her singing was awkward at times with some notes, but the bitch got down, so who am I to get upset?


Image result for sean combs vmas 2016Diddy/ Dirty Money/ Puff Daddy/ Sean Combs presented one of…what….four awards (?) for he whole show. Yes, the threw it East with the kimono. But when you realize the man is 46 and has not aged since you ever heard about him, it makes you consider wearing a kimono to see if it has age-defying properties. Also: stop the name changes, Sean P Diddy Dirty Money Daddy Combs.
Image result for ARIANA GRANDE VMAS 2016Giving us another reason to say “Look what we looked like back then!” 20 years from now, Ariana Grande performed with Nicki Minaj in what could be mistaken for an opening sequence to gay porn. Making us relive Olivia Newton John’s “Physical” video and maybe even question our sexual identity, Ariana did a daring job in heels that could cripple a middle-aged woman. Her voice was immaculate, per usual.
Image result for nick cannon VMAS 2016Just a quick aside and reason #82 I think Nick Cannon is a talentless piece of shit that deserves no fame or success.
Image result for VMAS 2016 alicia keysAlicia Keys DM’ed some spoken art stuff about war while presenting. I love that she’s doing the whole “no makeup, no problem” thing because she’s actually very pretty AND reminds me that Kim Kardashian is worthless in yet another way. I just wish Alicia did something with her hair to make it seem as if she did bathe occasionally.


Image result for future VMAS 2016Future, who I never really listened to because English is my primary language, did a charming performance of the classic “Fuck Up Some Commas,” a delightful phrase that can be summarized by urbandictionary.com as “spend[ing] an obscene amount of money,” in case you aren’t hip. I didn’t understand a word but the beat and the backup dancers/ hypers psyched me up!


Image result for VMAS 2016 kaney west fadeImage result for kanye west fadeImage result for kanye west fade

Kanye West was given 4 minutes to say whatever he wants. And I hate that that’s even a sentence, but the MTV producers were thirsty. He muttered some shit about nothing, used “like” about 18 times and even threw in a handful of “bro” and BROOOOOOOOO” for good measure, before forcing us to watch his new music video premiere for “Fade,” an updated Flashdance scene that was soaked in porn for 3 days and hung up to dry. It was just pure raunchiness before ending with a mild sex shower scene in which the girl looks like a cat while on top of a hot guy, has a baby, and is surrounded by farm animals. I wish I was hallucinating this.


Image result for VMAS 2016 nick jonas bulgeNick Jonas did a fair job performing about bacon and parading his bulge around to let the public know that he tucks left.


Image result for VMAS 2016 beyonce perform

BeyoncĂŠ did a Super Bowl Halftime performance to remind us that she is God, as well as to give the gays something to blog about the next day. I mean, what more can be said? She performed most of her Lemonade album, killed it, and ruined everything for performers who followed her act. I’m bitter, obv.


Image result for VMAS 2016 britney perform

Yes, MTV made Britney Spears perform RIGHT AFTER. They threw her under the BeyoncĂŠ Bus. She gave us what we’d expect: lipsyncing, harmless fun, sass, by-the-number choreo. And we’re ok with that. We had been praying for his since 2007 after she shaved her head. But when you do that after a big ass production that is BeyoncĂŠ, it ends up looking pitiful and helpless. But please consider that fact that she’s looking great again, dropped a killer album, and is back in the game. I feel for her the way I did in 1999. I can’t say that about Mariah.

Overall VMA’s: C+

“If MTV gives it glowing reviews, expect to enjoy it if you’re 19 years old.”- me

This movie had some good things going for itself. The good includes its fantastic lineup of actors’ and actresses’ voices. As with any Seth Rogen concept, it’s accompanied by the regulars: Jonah Hill, Paul Rudd, James Franco, etc., but a nice, lengthy list nonetheless. Another pro (and particular favorite of mine) is the creativity of the movie’s major synopsis. What the characters see compared to how humans perceive it is done hilariously.  Without giving anything away aside from the trailers’ reveal, I enjoyed myself heartily when the food was getting diced or eaten. And I’m pretty macabre.

When you think about it, Sausage Party came with a lot of potential. In this world that the movie creates, it stayed a pretty narrow coarse.  It maintained the sense of humor the 18-22 age range will eat up (*snare drum sound*), but beyond the outlandish death scenes, it just entertains sex and drugs….go figure. And don’t get me wrong, the sex scene was outrageous and funny. But Rogen always feels the need to rely on drugs to make a story funny when it’s already funny on its own.